Psychological factors of flow state in online learning
Abstract
Purpose of the article – The objective of this paper is to review and summarize the existing literature regarding the flow experience, its psychological drivers, and consequences in the context of e-learning, as well as to provide concrete suggestions for creating an optimal online learning experience.
Research methodology – A systematic review was conducted, and the literature was analysed through thematic analysis. The search was carried out in three electronic databases (PsycINFO, PubMed, and Scopus), and 17 articles were selected after applying inclusion criteria. Common tags in at least two articles were identified as themes. The main findings are synthesized in the discussion.
Findings – The findings indicate that flow is associated with a range of positive cognitive, emotional and motivational factors. Platforms that help students achieve flow are interactive, provide feedback, contain entertaining yet professional content, and consider the difficulty level. Teachers should promote interaction with and between students and tailor the level of support to individual students.
Practical implications – This study aims to provide concrete suggestions for improving online learning platforms and teaching, contributing to e-students’ satisfaction, performance, and continuance intentions.
Originality/Value – The value of this systematic review lies in its contribution to optimizing virtual classrooms and improving methods currently employed to enhance student engagement and learning outcomes.
References
Abuhamdeh, S. (2020). Investigating the “flow” experience: Key conceptual and operational issues. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00158
Baydas, O., Karakus, T., Topu, F. B., Yilmaz, R., Ozturk, M. E., & Goktas, Y. (2015). Retention and flow under guided and unguided learning experience in 3D virtual worlds. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 96–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.041
Bian, Y., & Zhou, C. (2022). Motivation effect of animated pedagogical agent's personality and feedback strategy types on learning in virtual training environment. Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware, 4(2), 153–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vrih.2021.11.001
Buil, I., Catalán, S., & Martínez, E. (2019). The influence of flow on learning outcomes: An empirical study on the use of clickers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 428–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12561.
Castleberry, A., & Nolen, A. (2018). Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds? Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 10(6), 807–815. doi:10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.019
Castro, M. D. B., & Tumibay, G. M. (2021). A literature review: Efficacy of online learning courses for higher education institution using meta-analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 1367–1385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10027-z
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2013). Flow: The psychology of happiness. Ebury Publishing.
Giasiranis, S., & Sofos, L. (2017). Flow experience and educational effectiveness of teaching informatics using AR. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(4), 78–88. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26229207
Goh, T. T., & Yang, B. (2021). The role of e-engagement and flow on the continuance with a learning management system in a blended learning environment. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00285-8
Gu, Y., Song, C., Zhong, Y., & Comite, U. (2022). The impact of teacher support and learning interaction on online learning continuation willingness: A flow experience perspective. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (Online), 17(17), 78–89. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i17.34029
Guerra-Tamez, C. R. (2023). The impact of immersion through virtual reality in the learning experiences of art and design students: The mediating effect of the flow experience. Education Sciences, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13020185
Ha, Y., & Im, H. (2020). The role of an interactive visual learning tool and its personalizability in online learning: Flow experience. Online Learning, 24(1), 205–226. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i1.1620
Hewei, T., & Youngsook, L. (2022). Influencing factors of online course learning intention of undergraduates majoring in art and design: Mediating effect of flow experience. Sage Open, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221134004
Hu, L., Hei, D., Wang, H., & Dai, X. (2023). Chinese college students collaborative mobile-assisted language learning experience and flow as a key factor for further adoption. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1165332
Jebur, G., Al-Samarraie, H., & Alzahrani, A. I. (2022). An adaptive Metalearner-based flow: A tool for reducing anxiety and increasing self-regulation. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 32(3), 469–501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-022-09330-1
Kaufmann, R., & Vallade, J. I. (2022). Maximizing the student experience: Moving forward with online learning. Communication Education, 71(2), 152–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2021.2022730
Klein, B. D., Rossin, D., Guo, Y. M., & Ro, Y. K. (2010). An examination of the effects of flow on learning in a graduate-level introductory operations management course. Journal of Education for Business, 85(5), 292–298. doi:10.1080/08832320903449600
Li, M., Wang, T., Lu, W., & Wang, M. (2022). Optimizing the systematic characteristics of online learning systems to enhance the continuance intention of Chinese college students. Sustainability, 14(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811774
Mehta, P., & Vyas, M. (2022). A systematic literature review on the experience of flow and its relation to intrinsic motivation in students. Indian Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(3), 299–304.
Naeem, M., Ozuem, W., Howell, K., & Ranfagni, S. (2023). A step-by-step process of thematic analysis to develop a conceptual model in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231205789
OECD, 2019. Trends shaping education 2019. OECD Publishing, Paris. doi:10.1787/trends_edu-2019-en
Rodríguez-Ardura, I., & Meseguer-Artola, A. (2016). Flow in e-learning: What drives it and why it matters. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(4), 899–915. doi:10.1111/bjet.12480
Rodríguez-Ardura, I., & Meseguer-Artola, A. (2019). Flow experiences in personalised e-learning environments and the role of gender and academic performance. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1572628
Rosairo, H. S. R. (2023). Thematic analysis in qualitative research [Editorial foreword]. The Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 18(3). doi:10.4038/jas.v18i3.10526
Shao, M., Hong, J. C., & Zhao, L. (2022). Impact of the self-directed learning approach and attitude on online learning ineffectiveness: The mediating roles of internet cognitive fatigue and flow state. Frontiers in Public Health, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.927454
Sherry, L. (1995). Issues in distance learning. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1(4), 337–365.
Somayeh, M., Dehghani, M., Mozaffari, F., Ghasemnegad, S., Hakimi, H., & Samaneh, B. (2016). The effectiveness of E-learning in learning: A review of the literature. International Journal of Medical Research and Health Sciences, 5(2), 86–91.
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1). doi:10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
Wang, W. T., Lin, Y. L., & Lu, H. E. (2023). Exploring the effect of improved learning performance: A mobile augmented reality learning system. Education and Information Technologies, 28(6), 7509–7541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11487-6
Wu, C. H., & Fan, W. S. (2024). Students’ flow experience of using AI-powered online english learning platforms. HighTech and Innovation Journal, 5(2), 382–399. doi:10.28991/HIJ-2024-05-02-011
Zhang, J., & Qi, F. (2023). Relationship between learning flow and academic performance among students: A systematic evaluation and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1270642.
Zhao, H., & Khan, A. (2022). The students’ flow experience with the continuous intention of using online English platforms. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.807084
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors retain rights under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International CC BY-SA 4.0. Authors assign copyright or license the publication rights in their articles, including abstracts, to MIP=JIBM. This enables us to ensure full copyright protection and to disseminate the article, and of course MIP=JIBM, to the widest possible readership in electronic format. Authors are themselves responsible for obtaining permission to reproduce copyright material from other sources.
