Acceptance of ICT in Agricultural Sector in the Republic of North Macedonia

  • Ivo Paunovski, MBA, PhD Cand. University American College Skopje, North Macedonia
  • Assoc. Prof. Dr. Dimitar Kovačevski University American College Skopje, School of Business Economics and Management, Skopje, North Macedonia
Keywords: ICT, agriculture, North Macedonia

Abstract

The agricultural industry is very important part of each economy. The main driver of global demand for agricultural products over the next decade will be increasing of population. The fact that the agriculture has to meet the growing needs of food production makes this sector very essential. However, intensifying of food production is more difficult nowadays because of the great impact of climate change, water scarcity and enlarging of land deficiency. The urgent need for increased farm production on less land with less water through further intensification is, therefore, very important. The research related to the acceptance of ICT in Agricultural Sector in Macedonia was done using literature review and semi structured interviews. A total of 40 (forty) Macedonian agricultural companies were invited to participate on this study. The results from this study revealed that three different components such as lack of awareness about the benefits, maturity of new technology including costs and lack of trainings and operational knowledge have been identified as challenges for the acceptance of ICT in Agriculture in Macedonia. For each component, the critical factors that are influencing the acceptance of ICT were identified. In conclusion, based on the research findings, a groundwork structure for ICT acceptance has been developed for Macedonian agricultural sector, which will help the agricultural stakeholders and ICT providers to determine the best way to move forward

References

Botsiou, M. and Dagdilelisa, V. (2013). Environment Aspects of incorporation of ICT in the Greek agricultural enterprises: The case of a prefecture. 6th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology in Agriculture, Food and Environment (pp. 387-396).

Fuentes, J. R. and Mies, V. (2012). Productivity Differences in Developing and Developed Countries: Where are the Bottlenecks? Available on-line at https://www.isid.ac.in/~pu/conference/dec_12_conf/Papers/RodrigoFuentes.pdf [Accessed 23.2.2018].

Griffin-EL E., Darko, E., Chater, R. and Mburu, S. (2014). A case study of health and agriculture social enterprises in Kenya. ODI Report March 2014.

Holster, H., Horakova, S., Ipema, B., Dusai, B., Giannerini, G., Teye, G., Martini, D., Shalloo, S., and Schmid, O. (2012). Current Situation on Data Exchange in Agriculture in EU27 & Switzerland: Final report. Prague: Czech Centre for Science and Society Wirelessinfo.

Kincheloe, J. L. and McLaren, P. (2005). Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln (Editors), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (3rd Edition). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication, pp. 303-342.

Krippendorff, Ȁ. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd Edition). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Mickovska-Raleva, A. and Shurkov, E. (2014). Background Analysis on the Spread and Trends of the Hidden Economy in Macedonia. Available at: http://www.crpm.org.mk/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Background_Analysis_EN.pdf [Accessed 23.2.2018].

Novkovska, B. (2013). Defining and Measuring Non-standard and Informal Employment in the Agricultural Sector. Paper presented at the Sixth International Conference on Agricultural Statistics.

OECD‑FAO (2016). OECD‑FAO Agricultural Outlook 2016‑2025 Special focus: Sub-Saharan Africa. Available at: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i5778e.pdf [Accessed 23.2.2018].

Patil, V. C., Gelb, E., Maru, A., Yadaraju, N. T., Moni, M. and Misra, H. (2008). Adoption of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) for Agriculture: An Indian case study. IAALD AFITA WCCA2008, World conference on agricultural information and IT (pp. 685 – 692).

Pierce F. J. and Nowak, P. (1999). Aspects of Precision Agriculture. Advances in Agronomy, 67, pp. 1-85.

Restuccia, D., Yang, D. T. and Zhu, X. (2003). Agriculture and Aggregate Productivity: A Quantitative Cross-Country Analysis. Journal of Monetary Economics, 55(2008), pp. 234–250.

Stankovic, M. and Stankovic, B. (2012). Social and economic aspects of the shadow economy in the Republic of Macedonia: A study. Social Science Research Network [online]. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2162922 [Accessed 23.2.2018].

Statista (2018). Macedonia: Share of economic sectors in the gross domestic product (GDP) from 2007 to 2017. Available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/510285/share-of-economic-sectors-in-the-gdp-in-macedonia/ [Accessed 23.2.2018].

Stiakakis Ǽ., Kariotellis, P., Vlachopoulou, M. (2009). From the digital divide to digital inequality: A secondary research in the European Union. In A. Sideridis and C. Z. Patrikakis (Editors), Next Generation Society: Technological and Legal Issues. Recited selected papers of the 3rd International Conference on e-Democracy. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 43-54.

Tevdoski, D. (2011) Decent Work in the Republic of Macedonia. Progress Institute, Palme Center and SOLIDAR [Online]. Available at: http://www.palmecenter.org/PageFiles/62765/Decent%20Work%20in%20the% 20Republic%2 0of%20Macedonia.pdf [Accessed 23.2.2018].

World Bank (2017). Western Balkans Labor Market Trends 2017. Available at: http://pubdocs.worldbank.org/en/336041491297229505/170403-Regional-Report-Western-Balkan-Labor-Market-Trends-2017-FINAL.pdf [Accessed 23.2.2018].

World Bank (2018a). Data Bank. Available at https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EA.PRD.AGRI.KD [Access 25.03.2018].

World Bank (2018b). Data catalog. Available at https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/agriculture-value-added-worker-constant-2010-us-0 [Accessed 23.2.2018].

Published
2019-08-12
How to Cite
Paunovski, I., & Kovačevski, D. (2019). Acceptance of ICT in Agricultural Sector in the Republic of North Macedonia. Mednarodno Inovativno Poslovanje = Journal of Innovative Business and Management, 11(2), 83-92. https://doi.org/10.32015/JIBM/2019-11-2-10
Section
Original article