The presence and impact of different board characteristics on the performance of the private companies in Kosovo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32015/JIBM.2025.17.2.11Keywords:
corporate governance, board of directors’ presence, board of directors’ characteristics, private companies.Abstract
In the recent years, corporate governance has garnered significant attention, evolving into a notable topic for discussion. Over the past decade, the behaviour and conduct of boards of directors have taken an extraordinary dimension. Moreover, the unpredicted and unprecedented outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic underscored the significance and the role of the business leaders, especially of the boards of directors. The purpose of this research is to study the presence and influence of various board characteristics on the performance of private companies in Kosovo. The research explores the relationship between board presence, board size, board independence, board composition, gender diversity, and the performance of these private companies in Kosovo. The research uses a quantitative approach, surveying large and medium-sized companies. A sample of 61 companies was selected to examine the correlation between board characteristics and company performance indicators such as Return on Equity (ROE), sales and profit. The findings show that 70% of the companies in the study have a board of directors. The results indicate that the presence of a board, as a proxy for adopting corporate governance practices, has a positive and significant impact on company performance. However, these boards often lack independence, being largely dominated by family members. Furthermore, gender diversity is limited, with women occupying only 17% of the total board seats. This research is expected to serve as a valuable guide and practical reference for policymakers, company owners, boards of directors, and top management teams, to comprehensively assess and facilitate improvement of the understanding of corporate governance in Kosovo.
References
1. Adebayo, S. O., Olusola, A. G., & Abiodun, O. F. (2013). Relationship between corporate governance and organizational performance: Nigerian listed organizations experience. International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 2(9), 1–6.
2. Aebi, V., Sabato, G., & Schmid, M. (2012). Risk management, corporate governance, and banking performance in the financial crisis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(12), 3213–3226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.10.020
3. Arber, H., & Dermaku, A. (2018). Corporate governance in the banking industry of Kosovo: Does board size and board independence matter? Journal of Finance & Banking Studies, 7(3), 20–34.
4. Arora, A. (2015). Literature review assessing the relationship between corporate governance and firm performance. In Compendium of research papers of the National Conference on Managing Tomorrow: Issues and Challenges. DY Patil Institute of Management Studies.
5. Bebchuk, L. A., & Weisbach, M. S. (2010). The state of corporate governance research. The Review of Financial Studies, 23(3), 939–961. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhp121
6. Belhaj, S., & Mateu, C. (2016). Corporate governance impact on bank performance: Evidence from Europe. Corporate Ownership & Control, 13(4-4), 583–597. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2809063
7. Bennedsen, M., Kongsted, H. C., & Nielsen, K. M. (2008). The causal effect of board size on the performance of small and medium-sized firms. Journal of Banking and Finance, 32, 1098–1109.
8. Boone, A., Field, L., Karpoff, J. M., & Raheja, C. G. (2007). The determinants of corporate board size and composition: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 85(1), 66–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.05.004
9. Capezio, A., & Mavisakalyan, A. (2016). Women in the boardroom and fraud: Evidence from Australia. Australian Journal of Management, 41(4), 719–734. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896215579463
10. Cheng, S. (2008). Board size and the variability of corporate performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 87(1), 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.10.006
11. Cumming, D., Leung, T. Y., & Rui, O. (2015). Gender diversity and securities fraud. Academy of Management Journal, 58(5), 1572–1593. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0750
12. Chiang, H. (2005). An empirical study of corporate governance and corporate performance. Journal of the American Academy of Business, Cambridge, 6(1), 122–140.
13. Deloitte. (2017). Seeing is believing: 2017 board diversity survey.
14. Deloitte. (2020, March 26). Stepping in: The board’s role in the COVID-19 crisis.
15. Duchin, R., Matsusaka, J. G., & Ozbas, O. (2010). When are outside directors effective? Journal of Financial Economics, 96(2), 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2009.12.004
16. Erhardt, N. L., Werbel, J. D., & Shrader, C. B. (2003). Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(2), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00011
17. European Commission. (2022, October). Key findings of the 2022 report on Kosovo. https://commission.europa.eu
18. Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325.
19. Forbes, D. P., & Milliken, F. J. (1999). Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of Management Review, 24, 489–505. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.2202133
20. Fuzi, S. F. S., Halim, S. A. A., & Julizaerma, M. K. (2016). Board independence and corporate performance. Procedia Economics and Finance, 37, 460–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30152-6
21. Huang, J., & Kisgen, D. J. (2013). Gender and corporate finance: Are male executives overconfident relative to female executives? Journal of Financial Economics, 108, 822–839.
22. Tilcsik, A., & Almandoz, J. (2016). When having too many experts on the board backfires. Academy of Management Journal, 59(4), 1124–1149.
23. Johnson, J. L., Daily, C. M., & Ellstrand, A. E. (1996). Boards of directors: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 22(3), 409–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639602200303
24. Işık, Ö., & İnce, A. R. (2016). Board size, board composition and performance: An investigation on Turkish banks. International Business Research, 9(2), 74–84.
(PDF) Board Size, Board Composition and Performance: An Investigation on Turkish Banks
25. McKinsey & Company (2018). Delivering through diversity. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/delivering-through-diversity
26. Nicholson, G. J., & Kiel, G. C. (2007). Can directors impact performance? A case-based test of three theories of corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(4), 585–608. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00590.x
27. OECD. (2023). G20/OECD principles of corporate governance. Retrieved from G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance 2023 | OECD
28. Rosenstein, S., & Wyatt, J. G. (1990). Outside directors, board independence and shareholders' wealth. Journal of Financial Economics, 26(2), 175–191.
29. Riinvest. (2015). Corporate governance in family-owned businesses in Kosovo. Prishtina, Kosovo.
30. Pfeffer, J. (1972). Size and composition of corporate boards of directors: The organization and its environment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(2), 218–228.
31. Pletzer, N., Kedzior, R., & Voelpel, S. C. (2015). Does gender matter? Female representation on corporate boards and firm financial performance—A meta-analysis. PLOS ONE, 10(6). https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0130005
32. Silva, A. L. C. d., & Leal, R. P. C. (2005). Corporate governance index, firm valuation, and performance in Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Finanças, 3(1), 1–18.
33. Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation for firms with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40, 185–211.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Gjyshinca Peja Merita
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors retain rights under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International CC BY-SA 4.0. Authors assign copyright or license the publication rights in their articles, including abstracts, to MIP=JIBM. This enables us to ensure full copyright protection and to disseminate the article, and of course MIP=JIBM, to the widest possible readership in electronic format. Authors are themselves responsible for obtaining permission to reproduce copyright material from other sources.
