Prisotnost in vpliv različnih značilnosti upravnega odbora na uspešnost zasebnih podjetij na Kosovu
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32015/JIBM.2025.17.2.11Ključne besede:
korporativno upravljanje, prisotnost upravnega odbora, značilnosti upravnega odbora, zasebna podjetjaPovzetek
V zadnjih letih je korporativno upravljanje pritegnilo veliko pozornosti in postalo pomembna tema razprav. V zadnjem desetletju so vedenje in ravnanja upravnih odborov dobila izjemne razsežnosti. Poleg tega je nepredviden in brezprecedenčen izbruh pandemije COVID-19 poudaril pomen in vlogo poslovnih voditeljev, zlasti upravnih odborov. Namen te raziskave je preučiti prisotnost in vpliv različnih značilnosti upravnega odbora na uspešnost zasebnih podjetij na Kosovu. Raziskava proučuje razmerje med prisotnostjo upravnega odbora, njegovo velikostjo, neodvisnostjo, spolno raznolikostjo in uspešnostjo teh zasebnih podjetij na Kosovu. Raziskava temelji na kvantitativnem pristopu, pri čemer zajema velika in srednje velika podjetja. Izbran je bil vzorec 61 podjetij, da bi raziskali korelacijo med značilnostmi upravnega odbora in kazalniki uspešnosti podjetja, kot so donosnost kapitala (ROE), prodaja in dobiček. Ugotovitve kažejo, da ima 70 % podjetij, vključenih v raziskavo, upravni odbor. Rezultati kažejo, da ima prisotnost upravnega odbora, kot pokazatelja sprejemanja praks korporativnega upravljanja, pozitiven in pomemben vpliv na uspešnost podjetja. Vendar pa ti odbori pogosto niso neodvisni, saj so v veliki meri sestavljeni iz družinskih članov. Poleg tega je spolna raznolikost omejena, ženske pa zasedajo le 17 % vseh mest v upravnih odborih. Pričakuje se, da bo ta raziskava služila kot dragocen vodnik in praktično referenčno gradivo za oblikovalce politik, lastnike podjetij, upravne odbore in vodstvene time pri celoviti oceni in spodbujanju izboljšav razumevanja korporativnega upravljanja na Kosovu.
Literatura
1. Adebayo, S. O., Olusola, A. G., & Abiodun, O. F. (2013). Relationship between corporate governance and organizational performance: Nigerian listed organizations experience. International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 2(9), 1–6.
2. Aebi, V., Sabato, G., & Schmid, M. (2012). Risk management, corporate governance, and banking performance in the financial crisis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(12), 3213–3226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.10.020
3. Arber, H., & Dermaku, A. (2018). Corporate governance in the banking industry of Kosovo: Does board size and board independence matter? Journal of Finance & Banking Studies, 7(3), 20–34.
4. Arora, A. (2015). Literature review assessing the relationship between corporate governance and firm performance. In Compendium of research papers of the National Conference on Managing Tomorrow: Issues and Challenges. DY Patil Institute of Management Studies.
5. Bebchuk, L. A., & Weisbach, M. S. (2010). The state of corporate governance research. The Review of Financial Studies, 23(3), 939–961. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhp121
6. Belhaj, S., & Mateu, C. (2016). Corporate governance impact on bank performance: Evidence from Europe. Corporate Ownership & Control, 13(4-4), 583–597. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2809063
7. Bennedsen, M., Kongsted, H. C., & Nielsen, K. M. (2008). The causal effect of board size on the performance of small and medium-sized firms. Journal of Banking and Finance, 32, 1098–1109.
8. Boone, A., Field, L., Karpoff, J. M., & Raheja, C. G. (2007). The determinants of corporate board size and composition: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 85(1), 66–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.05.004
9. Capezio, A., & Mavisakalyan, A. (2016). Women in the boardroom and fraud: Evidence from Australia. Australian Journal of Management, 41(4), 719–734. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896215579463
10. Cheng, S. (2008). Board size and the variability of corporate performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 87(1), 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.10.006
11. Cumming, D., Leung, T. Y., & Rui, O. (2015). Gender diversity and securities fraud. Academy of Management Journal, 58(5), 1572–1593. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0750
12. Chiang, H. (2005). An empirical study of corporate governance and corporate performance. Journal of the American Academy of Business, Cambridge, 6(1), 122–140.
13. Deloitte. (2017). Seeing is believing: 2017 board diversity survey.
14. Deloitte. (2020, March 26). Stepping in: The board’s role in the COVID-19 crisis.
15. Duchin, R., Matsusaka, J. G., & Ozbas, O. (2010). When are outside directors effective? Journal of Financial Economics, 96(2), 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2009.12.004
16. Erhardt, N. L., Werbel, J. D., & Shrader, C. B. (2003). Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(2), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00011
17. European Commission. (2022, October). Key findings of the 2022 report on Kosovo. https://commission.europa.eu
18. Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325.
19. Forbes, D. P., & Milliken, F. J. (1999). Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of Management Review, 24, 489–505. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.2202133
20. Fuzi, S. F. S., Halim, S. A. A., & Julizaerma, M. K. (2016). Board independence and corporate performance. Procedia Economics and Finance, 37, 460–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30152-6
21. Huang, J., & Kisgen, D. J. (2013). Gender and corporate finance: Are male executives overconfident relative to female executives? Journal of Financial Economics, 108, 822–839.
22. Tilcsik, A., & Almandoz, J. (2016). When having too many experts on the board backfires. Academy of Management Journal, 59(4), 1124–1149.
23. Johnson, J. L., Daily, C. M., & Ellstrand, A. E. (1996). Boards of directors: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 22(3), 409–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639602200303
24. Işık, Ö., & İnce, A. R. (2016). Board size, board composition and performance: An investigation on Turkish banks. International Business Research, 9(2), 74–84.
(PDF) Board Size, Board Composition and Performance: An Investigation on Turkish Banks
25. McKinsey & Company (2018). Delivering through diversity. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/delivering-through-diversity
26. Nicholson, G. J., & Kiel, G. C. (2007). Can directors impact performance? A case-based test of three theories of corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(4), 585–608. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00590.x
27. OECD. (2023). G20/OECD principles of corporate governance. Retrieved from G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance 2023 | OECD
28. Rosenstein, S., & Wyatt, J. G. (1990). Outside directors, board independence and shareholders' wealth. Journal of Financial Economics, 26(2), 175–191.
29. Riinvest. (2015). Corporate governance in family-owned businesses in Kosovo. Prishtina, Kosovo.
30. Pfeffer, J. (1972). Size and composition of corporate boards of directors: The organization and its environment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(2), 218–228.
31. Pletzer, N., Kedzior, R., & Voelpel, S. C. (2015). Does gender matter? Female representation on corporate boards and firm financial performance—A meta-analysis. PLOS ONE, 10(6). https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0130005
32. Silva, A. L. C. d., & Leal, R. P. C. (2005). Corporate governance index, firm valuation, and performance in Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Finanças, 3(1), 1–18.
33. Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation for firms with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40, 185–211.
Prenosi
Objavljeno
Številka
Rubrika
Licenca
Avtorske pravice (c) 2025 Gjyshinca Peja Merita
To delo je licencirano pod Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva-Nekomercialno 4.0 mednarodno licenco.
Avtorske pravice so zaščitene s Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva-Deljenje pod enakimi pogoji 4.0 Mednarodna CC BY-SA 4.0 in jih avtorji ohranijo v okviru te licence. Za objavo svojega članka, vključno s povzetkom, prenesejo avtorji avtorske oz. licenčne pravice na revijo MIP = JIBM. To nam omogoča popolno zaščito avtorskih pravic ter razširjanje članka in revije MIP=JIBM v najširši možni krog bralcev revije v elektronski obliki. Avtorji so sami odgovorni za pridobitev dovoljenja za razmnoževanje avtorskega gradiva iz drugih virov.
