Why the Concept of Private Demand for Innovations Should Be Understand: The case of ex-YU countries

Authors

  • Slagjana Stojanovska
  • Violeta Madzova
  • Biljana Gjozinska

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32015/JIMB/2018-10-2-6

Keywords:

private demand, buyer sophistication, innovations, value, sales

Abstract

This paper aims to provide a comparative analysis of private demand for innovation in the context of the ex-YU countries such as Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia and Macedonia from 2011 to 2016. One key variable for the importance of demand for innovation is the buyer sophistication. This signals the ability of buyers to select products and services based on performance rather than price and to bear the cost of products at the beginning of the life cycle. The companies that face a sophisticated domestic market are likely to sell high quality products and a close proximity to such consumers should to enables the company to better understand the needs and desires of the customers and how they perceive the value of the product. For cultural or historical reasons, buyers may be more demanding in some countries than in others. Hence, оur start point is that “higher degrees of buyer sophistication can to explain higher shares of innovative sales” (Hollanders and Es-Sadki, 2017, p. 42) and opposite “lower shares of innovative sales could to explain lower degrees of buyer sophistication” in the above countries. Thus, our analysis relies on two key indicators, the “buyer sophistication” and the “sales of new-to-market and new-to-firm product innovations”, which are including, the first in the Global Competitiveness Report and the second, in the European Innovation Scoreboard. Looking at the results, it can be noted that Serbia has a big gap between the two indicators, so the extent of buyer sophistication is lower from the extent of innovative sales. Аs business leaders make a subjective assessment of the GCR’s indicator Buyer sophistication, it can be assumed that Serbian business leaders assess the sophistication of domestic customers much lower than it is. This example is somewhat similar to the Slovenian business leaders. These two countries achieve the same level of sales of innovative products, while Macedonia and Croatia are in the same group and have lower sales of innovative products. This finding calls for demand-oriented policies which would have to influence the innovation culture in the market, making buyers more risk taking, aware of innovations and empower them to buy and use them.

References

Australian Government, Office of Best Practice Regulation (2012). Influencing Consumer Behaviour: Improving Regulatory Design. Available at: http://ris.pmc.gov.au/2012/12/18/obpr-research-paper-influencing-consumer-behaviour-improving-regulatory-design [Accessed: 21. 03. 2018].

Elder, J. (2013). Review of Policy Measures to Stimulate Private Demand for Innovation: Concepts and Effects, Nesta Working Paper 13/13

Edler, J. (2011). Innovation in EU CEE: the role of demand-based policy. In S. Radosevic and A. Kaderabkova (eds.), Challenges for European Innovation Policy: Cohesion and Excellence from a Schumpeterian Perspective. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 177-208.

Edler. J. (‎2009). Demand Policies for Innovation in EU CEE Countries. Manchester: Manchester Business School Working Paper No 579.

European Commision (various years). European Innovation Scoreboard. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documens/24141 [Accessed: 14.02.2018].

Hollanders, H., Es-Sadki, N. (2017). European Innovation Scoreboard 2017 – Methodology Report, European Commission.

Kotler, P. (2002). Marketing Management: Millennium Edition. 10th edn. Boston: Prentice-Hall.

Mowery, D., Rosemberg, N. (1979). The influence of market demand upon innovation: A critical review of some recent empirical studies. Research Policy, 8(2), pp. 102-153

NESTA, 2010. Demand and innovation: How customer preferences shape the innovation process. NESTA/The Work Foundation Working Paper: London NESTA.

OECD (2005). The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities; Oslo Manual, Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data. 3rd edn. Paris and Luxembourg: OECD, and Statistical Office of the European Communities.

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. 5th edn. New York: Free Press

Rothwell, R. (2007). The characteristics of successful innovators and technically progressive firms. R&D Management, 7(3), pp. 191-206

Salvatore, D. (2008). Microeconomics: Theory and Applications. 5th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press

R.R. (2005) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

World Economic Forum, the Global Competitiveness Report (publications from 2011 to 2016)

Downloads

Published

2019-07-01

Issue

Section

Original article

How to Cite

Stojanovska, S. ., Madzova, V. ., & Gjozinska, B. . (2019). Why the Concept of Private Demand for Innovations Should Be Understand: The case of ex-YU countries. Mednarodno Inovativno Poslovanje = Journal of Innovative Business and Management, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.32015/JIMB/2018-10-2-6