Psihološki faktorji zanosa v e-učenju
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32015/JIBM.2024.16.2.3Ključne besede:
e-učenje, zanos, psihološki faktorji, spodbujevalne metodePovzetek
Namen – Cilj raziskave je pregledati literaturo in povzeti dosedanje ugotovitve raziskav glede psiholoških predhodnikov in posledic zanosa v kontekstu e-učenja ter podati konkretne predloge za doseganje optimalne izkušnje virtualnega izobraževanja.
Metodologija – Sistematični pregled literature je bil izveden s pomočjo tematske analize. V treh elektronskih bazah (PsycINFO, PubMed in Scopus) je bilo najdenih 17 člankov, ki so ustrezali vključitvenim kriterijem. Identificirane teme so skupne vsaj dvema člankoma. V diskusiji so sintetizirane glavne ugotovitve.
Rezultati – Zanos je povezan z vrsto pozitivnih kognitivnih, čustvenih in motivacijskih faktorjev. Platforme, ki spodbujajo zanos, so interaktivne, učencem dajejo povratne informacije, ponujajo zabavno vendar strokovno vsebino ter upoštevajo nivo težavnosti. Vloga učiteljev je spodbujanje interakcije z in med študenti ter prilagajanje ravni podpore posameznim študentom.
Praktične implikacije – Podani so uporabni predlogi za izboljšavo e-izobraževalnih platform in poučevanja, z namenom povečanja zadovoljstva, izboljšanja učne uspešnosti ter vztrajanja v e-učenju.
Izvirnost/Vrednost – Članek prispeva k optimizaciji virtualnih učilnic in izboljšanju trenutnih metod za spodbujanje zavzetosti učencev in izboljšanje učnih izidov.
Literatura
Abuhamdeh, S. (2020). Investigating the “flow” experience: Key conceptual and operational issues. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00158
Baydas, O., Karakus, T., Topu, F. B., Yilmaz, R., Ozturk, M. E., & Goktas, Y. (2015). Retention and flow under guided and unguided learning experience in 3D virtual worlds. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 96–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.041
Bian, Y., & Zhou, C. (2022). Motivation effect of animated pedagogical agent's personality and feedback strategy types on learning in virtual training environment. Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware, 4(2), 153–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vrih.2021.11.001
Buil, I., Catalán, S., & Martínez, E. (2019). The influence of flow on learning outcomes: An empirical study on the use of clickers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 428–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12561.
Castleberry, A., & Nolen, A. (2018). Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds? Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 10(6), 807–815. doi:10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.019
Castro, M. D. B., & Tumibay, G. M. (2021). A literature review: Efficacy of online learning courses for higher education institution using meta-analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 1367–1385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10027-z
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2013). Flow: The psychology of happiness. Ebury Publishing.
Giasiranis, S., & Sofos, L. (2017). Flow experience and educational effectiveness of teaching informatics using AR. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(4), 78–88. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26229207
Goh, T. T., & Yang, B. (2021). The role of e-engagement and flow on the continuance with a learning management system in a blended learning environment. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00285-8
Gu, Y., Song, C., Zhong, Y., & Comite, U. (2022). The impact of teacher support and learning interaction on online learning continuation willingness: A flow experience perspective. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (Online), 17(17), 78–89. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i17.34029
Guerra-Tamez, C. R. (2023). The impact of immersion through virtual reality in the learning experiences of art and design students: The mediating effect of the flow experience. Education Sciences, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13020185
Ha, Y., & Im, H. (2020). The role of an interactive visual learning tool and its personalizability in online learning: Flow experience. Online Learning, 24(1), 205–226. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i1.1620
Hewei, T., & Youngsook, L. (2022). Influencing factors of online course learning intention of undergraduates majoring in art and design: Mediating effect of flow experience. Sage Open, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221134004
Hu, L., Hei, D., Wang, H., & Dai, X. (2023). Chinese college students collaborative mobile-assisted language learning experience and flow as a key factor for further adoption. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1165332
Jebur, G., Al-Samarraie, H., & Alzahrani, A. I. (2022). An adaptive Metalearner-based flow: A tool for reducing anxiety and increasing self-regulation. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 32(3), 469–501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-022-09330-1
Kaufmann, R., & Vallade, J. I. (2022). Maximizing the student experience: Moving forward with online learning. Communication Education, 71(2), 152–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2021.2022730
Klein, B. D., Rossin, D., Guo, Y. M., & Ro, Y. K. (2010). An examination of the effects of flow on learning in a graduate-level introductory operations management course. Journal of Education for Business, 85(5), 292–298. doi:10.1080/08832320903449600
Li, M., Wang, T., Lu, W., & Wang, M. (2022). Optimizing the systematic characteristics of online learning systems to enhance the continuance intention of Chinese college students. Sustainability, 14(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811774
Mehta, P., & Vyas, M. (2022). A systematic literature review on the experience of flow and its relation to intrinsic motivation in students. Indian Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(3), 299–304.
Naeem, M., Ozuem, W., Howell, K., & Ranfagni, S. (2023). A step-by-step process of thematic analysis to develop a conceptual model in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231205789
OECD, 2019. Trends shaping education 2019. OECD Publishing, Paris. doi:10.1787/trends_edu-2019-en
Rodríguez-Ardura, I., & Meseguer-Artola, A. (2016). Flow in e-learning: What drives it and why it matters. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(4), 899–915. doi:10.1111/bjet.12480
Rodríguez-Ardura, I., & Meseguer-Artola, A. (2019). Flow experiences in personalised e-learning environments and the role of gender and academic performance. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1572628
Rosairo, H. S. R. (2023). Thematic analysis in qualitative research [Editorial foreword]. The Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 18(3). doi:10.4038/jas.v18i3.10526
Shao, M., Hong, J. C., & Zhao, L. (2022). Impact of the self-directed learning approach and attitude on online learning ineffectiveness: The mediating roles of internet cognitive fatigue and flow state. Frontiers in Public Health, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.927454
Sherry, L. (1995). Issues in distance learning. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1(4), 337–365.
Somayeh, M., Dehghani, M., Mozaffari, F., Ghasemnegad, S., Hakimi, H., & Samaneh, B. (2016). The effectiveness of E-learning in learning: A review of the literature. International Journal of Medical Research and Health Sciences, 5(2), 86–91.
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1). doi:10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
Wang, W. T., Lin, Y. L., & Lu, H. E. (2023). Exploring the effect of improved learning performance: A mobile augmented reality learning system. Education and Information Technologies, 28(6), 7509–7541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11487-6
Wu, C. H., & Fan, W. S. (2024). Students’ flow experience of using AI-powered online english learning platforms. HighTech and Innovation Journal, 5(2), 382–399. doi:10.28991/HIJ-2024-05-02-011
Zhang, J., & Qi, F. (2023). Relationship between learning flow and academic performance among students: A systematic evaluation and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1270642.
Zhao, H., & Khan, A. (2022). The students’ flow experience with the continuous intention of using online English platforms. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.807084
Prenosi
Objavljeno
Številka
Rubrika
Licenca
Avtorske pravice so zaščitene s Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva-Deljenje pod enakimi pogoji 4.0 Mednarodna CC BY-SA 4.0 in jih avtorji ohranijo v okviru te licence. Za objavo svojega članka, vključno s povzetkom, prenesejo avtorji avtorske oz. licenčne pravice na revijo MIP = JIBM. To nam omogoča popolno zaščito avtorskih pravic ter razširjanje članka in revije MIP=JIBM v najširši možni krog bralcev revije v elektronski obliki. Avtorji so sami odgovorni za pridobitev dovoljenja za razmnoževanje avtorskega gradiva iz drugih virov.
